Collection Title: | SIU Thesis | Title : | Rural Poor And Micro Finance Institutions at Mahottari, Janakpur, Nepal: A Socio-Economic Perspective | Material Type: | printed text | Authors: | Dilip Kumar Jha, Author ; Walsh, John, Associated Name ; Pacapol Anurit, Associated Name | Publisher: | Bangkok: Shinawatra University | Publication Date: | 2014 | Pagination: | ix, 142 p. | Layout: | ill, tables | Size: | 30 cm. | Price: | 500.00 | General note: | SIU THE: SOM-PhD-MS-2014-A02
Thesis [Ph.D.[Management Science]]--Shinawatra University, 2014 | Languages : | English (eng) | Descriptors: | [LCSH]Rural Poor -- Nepal
| Keywords: | Rural,
Poverty,
Seasonal Migration,
Livestock,
Micro-Finance Institutions | Abstract: | The study has been done in the rural areas of the Janakpur as case study of the short term migration, livestock as an income generating activities and MFIs as a microloan provider in a socio-economic perspective. The study was done to compare the socio-economic situation with the short term migrant and non-migrant, MFIs borrowers and non-borrowers, perspective of rearing livestock in poor rural area in Janakpur. It is found that most of the family or at least the one or more family members have migrated in search of job out of the village either in nearby town, city and boarder area with India and the income through migrating is the dependable source of their livelihood, paying back the debt they obeyed. There is little or none change has been seen in the migrants’ households as they spent most of their earning on the consumption purposes, payback debt, on medical expenses, building houses. Few of them have invested their saving on income generating activities: the cash crops, livestock and small scale of instant cash businesses. It can be seen that livestock is a common asset amongst households across all expenditure. The majority of households, therefore, have some motives to keep livestock, either as a risk-coping or income-enhancing strategy. Poorer households are more likely to keep small ruminants than richer ones who are more likely to keep large ruminants. Well-off is using livestock as the consumption and income enhancing purposes whereas the poor households see it as an income generating or the exchange mode of money in immediate need. It was seen that the most of the clients housing quality and household has been increased and they are having a good condition home that can save them with seasonal disaster in comparison to non-clients. | Curricular : | BBA/MBA/PhDM | Record link: | http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=26249 |
SIU Thesis. Rural Poor And Micro Finance Institutions at Mahottari, Janakpur, Nepal: A Socio-Economic Perspective [printed text] / Dilip Kumar Jha, Author ; Walsh, John, Associated Name ; Pacapol Anurit, Associated Name . - [S.l.] : Bangkok: Shinawatra University, 2014 . - ix, 142 p. : ill, tables ; 30 cm. 500.00 SIU THE: SOM-PhD-MS-2014-A02
Thesis [Ph.D.[Management Science]]--Shinawatra University, 2014 Languages : English ( eng) Descriptors: | [LCSH]Rural Poor -- Nepal
| Keywords: | Rural,
Poverty,
Seasonal Migration,
Livestock,
Micro-Finance Institutions | Abstract: | The study has been done in the rural areas of the Janakpur as case study of the short term migration, livestock as an income generating activities and MFIs as a microloan provider in a socio-economic perspective. The study was done to compare the socio-economic situation with the short term migrant and non-migrant, MFIs borrowers and non-borrowers, perspective of rearing livestock in poor rural area in Janakpur. It is found that most of the family or at least the one or more family members have migrated in search of job out of the village either in nearby town, city and boarder area with India and the income through migrating is the dependable source of their livelihood, paying back the debt they obeyed. There is little or none change has been seen in the migrants’ households as they spent most of their earning on the consumption purposes, payback debt, on medical expenses, building houses. Few of them have invested their saving on income generating activities: the cash crops, livestock and small scale of instant cash businesses. It can be seen that livestock is a common asset amongst households across all expenditure. The majority of households, therefore, have some motives to keep livestock, either as a risk-coping or income-enhancing strategy. Poorer households are more likely to keep small ruminants than richer ones who are more likely to keep large ruminants. Well-off is using livestock as the consumption and income enhancing purposes whereas the poor households see it as an income generating or the exchange mode of money in immediate need. It was seen that the most of the clients housing quality and household has been increased and they are having a good condition home that can save them with seasonal disaster in comparison to non-clients. | Curricular : | BBA/MBA/PhDM | Record link: | http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=26249 |
|