Collection Title:	SIU Thesis
Title :	Sustainable Strategies Applied on Building Stock: Operation and Maintenance Rating Schemes For Building Stakeholders
Material Type:	printed text
Authors:	Thu Thu Nway Kyaw, Author ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name
Publisher:	Bangkok: Shinawatra University
Publication Date:	2017
Pagination:	ix, 122 p.
Layout:	Tables, ill
Size:	30 ซม.
Price:	500.00
General note:	SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-02 THE. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.
Languages :	English (eng)
Descriptors:	[LCSH]Stock [LCSH]Strategy [LCSH]Sustainable
Keywords:	Sustainable Building Stock Operation and Maintenance Sustainable Building Rating Scheme BREEAM In-Use LEED EB:OM
Abstract:	With increasing building stock worldwide, sustainable building rating (or assessment) schemes for the operation and maintenance of existing buildings are becoming a significant part for sustainable building development. By supporting stakeholders’ effort in improving their existing buildings to become more sustainable, employed strategies of such rating schemes are expected to significantly contribute to the global demand for achieving improved sustainable building targets. While currently only two internationally recognized rating schemes for worldwide application exist, namely BREEAM In-Use (Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method) and LEED EB:OM (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Building Operation and Maintenance), the here presented research is focusing on their comparison to better understand their similarities, differences, and overall benefits for the sustainable development of existing commercial buildings in Thailand. Considering the diverse nature of individual assessment criteria, this study of two rating schemes is divided into three parts: A quantitative analysis based on comparable criteria of performance and scheme contribution in sustainable benefits, implementation plan and cost (capital cost and maintenance cost); a qualitative analysis based on sustainable and user oriented benefits; and an analysis of non-comparative criteria of sustainable benefits, implementation plan, and cost. Results found that in terms of quantitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use has a marginal advantage when compared to LEED EB:OM. Considering the qualitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use indicates higher benefits in 18 out of 27 comparable criteria, LEED EB:OM demonstrating higher benefits in 7 comparable criteria, and the remaining criteria having equal benefits. When analyzing comparable criteria sector by sector, BREEAM In-Use has potential benefits on water, material, waste and transportation sectors, LEED EB:OM has potential benefits on pollution sector. Considering the total rating criteria of 55% of non-comparative criteria, about 43.33% constitute for BREEAM In-Use and 11.67% for LEED EB:OM. With both rating scheme being close in their overall performance, one suggestion for improvement is the combination of individual categories to reach higher sustainable benefits on building stock.
Curricular :	BBA/BSMT/MBA/MSMT
Record link:	http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27544

SIU Thesis. Sustainable Strategies Applied on Building Stock: Operation and Maintenance Rating Schemes For Building Stakeholders [printed text] / Thu Thu Nway Kyaw, Author ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name . - [S.l.] : Bangkok: Shinawatra University, 2017 . - ix, 122 p. : Tables, ill ; 30 ซม.
500.00
SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-02
THE. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.
Languages : English (eng)

Descriptors:	[LCSH]Stock [LCSH]Strategy [LCSH]Sustainable
Keywords:	Sustainable Building Stock Operation and Maintenance Sustainable Building Rating Scheme BREEAM In-Use LEED EB:OM
Abstract:	With increasing building stock worldwide, sustainable building rating (or assessment) schemes for the operation and maintenance of existing buildings are becoming a significant part for sustainable building development. By supporting stakeholders’ effort in improving their existing buildings to become more sustainable, employed strategies of such rating schemes are expected to significantly contribute to the global demand for achieving improved sustainable building targets. While currently only two internationally recognized rating schemes for worldwide application exist, namely BREEAM In-Use (Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method) and LEED EB:OM (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Building Operation and Maintenance), the here presented research is focusing on their comparison to better understand their similarities, differences, and overall benefits for the sustainable development of existing commercial buildings in Thailand. Considering the diverse nature of individual assessment criteria, this study of two rating schemes is divided into three parts: A quantitative analysis based on comparable criteria of performance and scheme contribution in sustainable benefits, implementation plan and cost (capital cost and maintenance cost); a qualitative analysis based on sustainable and user oriented benefits; and an analysis of non-comparative criteria of sustainable benefits, implementation plan, and cost. Results found that in terms of quantitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use has a marginal advantage when compared to LEED EB:OM. Considering the qualitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use indicates higher benefits in 18 out of 27 comparable criteria, LEED EB:OM demonstrating higher benefits in 7 comparable criteria, and the remaining criteria having equal benefits. When analyzing comparable criteria sector by sector, BREEAM In-Use has potential benefits on water, material, waste and transportation sectors, LEED EB:OM has potential benefits on pollution sector. Considering the total rating criteria of 55% of non-comparative criteria, about 43.33% constitute for BREEAM In-Use and 11.67% for LEED EB:OM. With both rating scheme being close in their overall performance, one suggestion for improvement is the combination of individual categories to reach higher sustainable benefits on building stock.
Curricular :	BBA/BSMT/MBA/MSMT
Record link:	http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27544