From this page you can:
| Home |
Author details
Author Martin Schoch,
Available item(s) by this author
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sourcesReprinted Collection. Shaping building-volumes through life cycle costs / Schoch, Martin / CAADRIA - 2010
Collection Title: Reprinted Collection Title : Shaping building-volumes through life cycle costs : a constraint based programming approach for building volume optimizationh(reprinted) Material Type: printed text Authors: Schoch, Martin, Author ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name ; Chakguy Prakasvudhisarn, Associated Name Publisher: CAADRIA Publication Date: 2010 Pagination: 10 p. Layout: ill. Size: 30 cm. Price: 50 Baht General note: New frontiers : proceedings of the 15th international conference on computer-aides architectural design in Asia, CAADRIA 2010, 7-10 April 2010
Design optimisationLanguages : English (eng) Descriptors: [LCSH]Computer-aided design
[LCSH]Constraint programming (Computer science)
[LCSH]Engineering designRecord link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=18033 Reprinted Collection. Shaping building-volumes through life cycle costs : a constraint based programming approach for building volume optimizationh(reprinted) [printed text] / Schoch, Martin, Author ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name ; Chakguy Prakasvudhisarn, Associated Name . - Hong Kong : CAADRIA, 2010 . - 10 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.
50 Baht
New frontiers : proceedings of the 15th international conference on computer-aides architectural design in Asia, CAADRIA 2010, 7-10 April 2010
Design optimisation
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: [LCSH]Computer-aided design
[LCSH]Constraint programming (Computer science)
[LCSH]Engineering designRecord link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=18033 Hold
Place a hold on this item
Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 32002000261261 REP574 2010 c.1 Reprinted Graduate Library Reprint Shelf Available 32002000260990 REP574 2010 c.2 Reprinted Graduate Library Reprint Shelf Available 32002000261287 REP574 2010 c.3 Reprinted Main Library Reprint Shelf Available 32002000261279 REP574 2010 c.4 Reprinted Main Library Reprint Shelf Available
Collection Title: SIU RS Title : Survey on Building Information Modeling Usage for Structural Engineering Design Practice in Thailand Material Type: printed text Authors: Cho Myat Thwin, Author ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name Publisher: Bangkok: Shinawatra University Publication Date: 2016 Pagination: vi, 23 p. Layout: ill, Tables Size: 30 cm. Price: 500.00 General note: SIU RS: SOMT-MSMT-2016-01
Research Study. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.Languages : English (eng) Descriptors: [LCSH]Building information modeling
[LCSH]Structural engineeringKeywords: Structural Engineering, Structural design process, BIM implementation Abstract: With the implementation of building information modeling (BIM) into structural design, existing, conventionally practiced work flows become subject to change. While such transitions are considered an improvement to exiting practices, they may also unveil apparent difficulties of BIM implementation.
Perhaps the greatest innovation in structural engineering industry, building information modeling (BIM) is the most promising recent development in structural engineering design practice in Thailand. Basically, structural engineering design has four stages: pre-processing, structural analysis, post-processing, and structural design. In each stage, there are created several flaws of design steps in engineering design process.
This study investigates current working practices for structural design engineers in order to the implementation of BIM during such processes. Through a qualitative methodology a survey between existing design methods of structural engineering companies was conducted with focuses on aspects of changes such as workflow, time saving, benefits or difficulties of implementation.
Results suggest that, when comparing to the traditional workflow of using non BIM software, benefits of utilizing BIM for the structural design, whether partially or fully implemented, can be found when considering aspects of time saving, information exchange capabilities or error handling. Also intend to encourage the implementation of BIM application and usage for recent innovations in the technology and the future of structural engineering practices.
Since the design processes on each stage are clearly stated by making comparison on BIM, partially BIM, and non BIM process for more specifically to traditional structural design engineers to perform quickly, accurately, and more understand on its limitation, assumption and benefits.Curricular : BSMT/MSMT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27510 SIU RS. Survey on Building Information Modeling Usage for Structural Engineering Design Practice in Thailand [printed text] / Cho Myat Thwin, Author ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name . - [S.l.] : Bangkok: Shinawatra University, 2016 . - vi, 23 p. : ill, Tables ; 30 cm.
500.00
SIU RS: SOMT-MSMT-2016-01
Research Study. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: [LCSH]Building information modeling
[LCSH]Structural engineeringKeywords: Structural Engineering, Structural design process, BIM implementation Abstract: With the implementation of building information modeling (BIM) into structural design, existing, conventionally practiced work flows become subject to change. While such transitions are considered an improvement to exiting practices, they may also unveil apparent difficulties of BIM implementation.
Perhaps the greatest innovation in structural engineering industry, building information modeling (BIM) is the most promising recent development in structural engineering design practice in Thailand. Basically, structural engineering design has four stages: pre-processing, structural analysis, post-processing, and structural design. In each stage, there are created several flaws of design steps in engineering design process.
This study investigates current working practices for structural design engineers in order to the implementation of BIM during such processes. Through a qualitative methodology a survey between existing design methods of structural engineering companies was conducted with focuses on aspects of changes such as workflow, time saving, benefits or difficulties of implementation.
Results suggest that, when comparing to the traditional workflow of using non BIM software, benefits of utilizing BIM for the structural design, whether partially or fully implemented, can be found when considering aspects of time saving, information exchange capabilities or error handling. Also intend to encourage the implementation of BIM application and usage for recent innovations in the technology and the future of structural engineering practices.
Since the design processes on each stage are clearly stated by making comparison on BIM, partially BIM, and non BIM process for more specifically to traditional structural design engineers to perform quickly, accurately, and more understand on its limitation, assumption and benefits.Curricular : BSMT/MSMT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27510 Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 32002000595932 SIU RS: SOMT-MSMT-2016-01 c.1 SIU Research Study Main Library Library Counter Not for loan
Collection Title: SIU Thesis Title : Methodological Approach to Improve LEED Certification Understanding Using LEED V4 Interior Design and Construction Material Type: printed text Authors: Liangda Heng, Author ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name Publisher: Bangkok: Shinawatra University Publication Date: 2017 Pagination: viiii, 201 p. Layout: ill, tables Size: 30 cm. Price: 500.00 General note: SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-01
THE. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.Languages : English (eng) Descriptors: [LCSH]Construction
[LCSH]DesignKeywords: Sustainable interior design,
LEED v4 Interior Design and Construction,
Independent level of specialist support,
Financial benefit,
Social benefit,
Environmental benefitAbstract: Developing sustainable design in commercial interior spaces improves both the health performance on occupants and environment, and provides cost savings. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating systems provide sustainable guidelines in design, construction, operation, and maintenance of green buildings for the building owners, designers and engineers, and offer sustainable certification for buildings. The LEED v4 Interior Design and Construction (LEED ID&C) defines indoor sustainable requirements that focus on improving commercial interior design and management. It is considered a guideline for professionals and advanced specialists who have sustainable design and management experience (Mendler, Odell, & Lazarus, 2006). Understanding the LEED rating system and its sustainable requirements will help the designers strengthen the knowledge of sustainability in the related key fields of interiors, gain more benefits, and be able to satisfy the LEED requirements successfully.
This research focuses on the development of a tool to help project stakeholders improve their understanding on using the LEED ID&C guidelines by prioritizing the LEED ID&C criteria according to financial, social, and environmental benefits and their need for specialist support, which allows an informed decision making process to achieve the desired level of LEED certification. The scores obtained in the rating table depend on the background and experiences of the project owners or the interior designers. Utilizing these rating scores as inputs, the ranking table automatically lists the LEED ID&C criteria by their weighted average scores of the rating scale in four different aspects in descending order, and calculates the accumulated LEED credits while evaluating the achieved LEED certifications. This rating and comparing processes of the LEED criteria were based on Analytic Hierarchic Process (AHP) method. The AHP is a popular theory of measurement for measuring and judging intangibles (Saaty, 2008).
This research tool simplifies the process of evaluating LEED criteria, and listed the potential certification points that can be earned based on the LEED certification systems. Consequently, the preferable LEED criteria obtained with the help of this tool can then be applied in the selected interior sustainable design project.
Another objective of this research is to illustrate the effectiveness and usefulness of this tool through utilizing this tool to analyze and evaluate LEED criteria, and to recognize the general sustainable value of the seven major categories in terms of financial, social and environmental benefits, and independent level of specialist support, in order to help the project team concentrate on the improvement of the most recommended criteria with the related key fields. Part of the objective is also to improve the collaboration of team members through putting the preferred criteria into design process with the related core specialists.
With the research based on hypothetical situations, readers can utilize this research to measure their own project. For further research, a real project should be utilized to test and verify the results of this research, and illustrate the usefulness and capabilities of the ranking table.Curricular : BSMT/MSMT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27205 SIU Thesis. Methodological Approach to Improve LEED Certification Understanding Using LEED V4 Interior Design and Construction [printed text] / Liangda Heng, Author ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name . - [S.l.] : Bangkok: Shinawatra University, 2017 . - viiii, 201 p. : ill, tables ; 30 cm.
500.00
SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-01
THE. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: [LCSH]Construction
[LCSH]DesignKeywords: Sustainable interior design,
LEED v4 Interior Design and Construction,
Independent level of specialist support,
Financial benefit,
Social benefit,
Environmental benefitAbstract: Developing sustainable design in commercial interior spaces improves both the health performance on occupants and environment, and provides cost savings. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating systems provide sustainable guidelines in design, construction, operation, and maintenance of green buildings for the building owners, designers and engineers, and offer sustainable certification for buildings. The LEED v4 Interior Design and Construction (LEED ID&C) defines indoor sustainable requirements that focus on improving commercial interior design and management. It is considered a guideline for professionals and advanced specialists who have sustainable design and management experience (Mendler, Odell, & Lazarus, 2006). Understanding the LEED rating system and its sustainable requirements will help the designers strengthen the knowledge of sustainability in the related key fields of interiors, gain more benefits, and be able to satisfy the LEED requirements successfully.
This research focuses on the development of a tool to help project stakeholders improve their understanding on using the LEED ID&C guidelines by prioritizing the LEED ID&C criteria according to financial, social, and environmental benefits and their need for specialist support, which allows an informed decision making process to achieve the desired level of LEED certification. The scores obtained in the rating table depend on the background and experiences of the project owners or the interior designers. Utilizing these rating scores as inputs, the ranking table automatically lists the LEED ID&C criteria by their weighted average scores of the rating scale in four different aspects in descending order, and calculates the accumulated LEED credits while evaluating the achieved LEED certifications. This rating and comparing processes of the LEED criteria were based on Analytic Hierarchic Process (AHP) method. The AHP is a popular theory of measurement for measuring and judging intangibles (Saaty, 2008).
This research tool simplifies the process of evaluating LEED criteria, and listed the potential certification points that can be earned based on the LEED certification systems. Consequently, the preferable LEED criteria obtained with the help of this tool can then be applied in the selected interior sustainable design project.
Another objective of this research is to illustrate the effectiveness and usefulness of this tool through utilizing this tool to analyze and evaluate LEED criteria, and to recognize the general sustainable value of the seven major categories in terms of financial, social and environmental benefits, and independent level of specialist support, in order to help the project team concentrate on the improvement of the most recommended criteria with the related key fields. Part of the objective is also to improve the collaboration of team members through putting the preferred criteria into design process with the related core specialists.
With the research based on hypothetical situations, readers can utilize this research to measure their own project. For further research, a real project should be utilized to test and verify the results of this research, and illustrate the usefulness and capabilities of the ranking table.Curricular : BSMT/MSMT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27205 Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 32002000594471 SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-01 c.1 SIU Thesis and Dissertation Main Library Library Counter Not for loan 32002000594539 SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-01 c.2 Thesis Main Library Library Counter Not for loan
Collection Title: SIU Thesis Title : Sustainable Strategies Applied on Building Stock: Operation and Maintenance Rating Schemes For Building Stakeholders Material Type: printed text Authors: Thu Thu Nway Kyaw, Author ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name Publisher: Bangkok: Shinawatra University Publication Date: 2017 Pagination: ix, 122 p. Layout: Tables, ill Size: 30 ซม. Price: 500.00 General note: SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-02
THE. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.Languages : English (eng) Descriptors: [LCSH]Stock
[LCSH]Strategy
[LCSH]SustainableKeywords: Sustainable Building Stock
Operation and Maintenance
Sustainable Building Rating Scheme
BREEAM In-Use
LEED EB:OMAbstract: With increasing building stock worldwide, sustainable building rating (or assessment) schemes for the operation and maintenance of existing buildings are becoming a significant part for sustainable building development. By supporting stakeholders’ effort in improving their existing buildings to become more sustainable, employed strategies of such rating schemes are expected to significantly contribute to the global demand for achieving improved sustainable building targets. While currently only two internationally recognized rating schemes for worldwide application exist, namely BREEAM In-Use (Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method) and LEED EB:OM (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Building Operation and Maintenance), the here presented research is focusing on their comparison to better understand their similarities, differences, and overall benefits for the sustainable development of existing commercial buildings in Thailand. Considering the diverse nature of individual assessment criteria, this study of two rating schemes is divided into three parts: A quantitative analysis based on comparable criteria of performance and scheme contribution in sustainable benefits, implementation plan and cost (capital cost and maintenance cost); a qualitative analysis based on sustainable and user oriented benefits; and an analysis of non-comparative criteria of sustainable benefits, implementation plan, and cost.
Results found that in terms of quantitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use has a marginal advantage when compared to LEED EB:OM. Considering the qualitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use indicates higher benefits in 18 out of 27 comparable criteria, LEED EB:OM demonstrating higher benefits in 7 comparable criteria, and the remaining criteria having equal benefits. When analyzing comparable criteria sector by sector, BREEAM In-Use has potential benefits on water, material, waste and transportation sectors, LEED EB:OM has potential benefits on pollution sector. Considering the total rating criteria of 55% of non-comparative criteria, about 43.33% constitute for BREEAM In-Use and 11.67% for LEED EB:OM. With both rating scheme being close in their overall performance, one suggestion for improvement is the combination of individual categories to reach higher sustainable benefits on building stock.Curricular : BBA/BSMT/MBA/MSMT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27544 SIU Thesis. Sustainable Strategies Applied on Building Stock: Operation and Maintenance Rating Schemes For Building Stakeholders [printed text] / Thu Thu Nway Kyaw, Author ; Schoch, Martin, Associated Name ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name . - [S.l.] : Bangkok: Shinawatra University, 2017 . - ix, 122 p. : Tables, ill ; 30 ซม.
500.00
SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-02
THE. [MSMT.[Management Technology]] -- Shinawatra University, 2017.
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: [LCSH]Stock
[LCSH]Strategy
[LCSH]SustainableKeywords: Sustainable Building Stock
Operation and Maintenance
Sustainable Building Rating Scheme
BREEAM In-Use
LEED EB:OMAbstract: With increasing building stock worldwide, sustainable building rating (or assessment) schemes for the operation and maintenance of existing buildings are becoming a significant part for sustainable building development. By supporting stakeholders’ effort in improving their existing buildings to become more sustainable, employed strategies of such rating schemes are expected to significantly contribute to the global demand for achieving improved sustainable building targets. While currently only two internationally recognized rating schemes for worldwide application exist, namely BREEAM In-Use (Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method) and LEED EB:OM (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Building Operation and Maintenance), the here presented research is focusing on their comparison to better understand their similarities, differences, and overall benefits for the sustainable development of existing commercial buildings in Thailand. Considering the diverse nature of individual assessment criteria, this study of two rating schemes is divided into three parts: A quantitative analysis based on comparable criteria of performance and scheme contribution in sustainable benefits, implementation plan and cost (capital cost and maintenance cost); a qualitative analysis based on sustainable and user oriented benefits; and an analysis of non-comparative criteria of sustainable benefits, implementation plan, and cost.
Results found that in terms of quantitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use has a marginal advantage when compared to LEED EB:OM. Considering the qualitative analysis, BREEAM In-Use indicates higher benefits in 18 out of 27 comparable criteria, LEED EB:OM demonstrating higher benefits in 7 comparable criteria, and the remaining criteria having equal benefits. When analyzing comparable criteria sector by sector, BREEAM In-Use has potential benefits on water, material, waste and transportation sectors, LEED EB:OM has potential benefits on pollution sector. Considering the total rating criteria of 55% of non-comparative criteria, about 43.33% constitute for BREEAM In-Use and 11.67% for LEED EB:OM. With both rating scheme being close in their overall performance, one suggestion for improvement is the combination of individual categories to reach higher sustainable benefits on building stock.Curricular : BBA/BSMT/MBA/MSMT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27544 Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 32002000596625 SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-02 c.1 SIU Thesis and Dissertation Main Library Library Counter Not for loan 32002000596591 SIU THE: SOMT-MSMT-2017-02 c.2 SIU Thesis and Dissertation Main Library Library Counter Not for loan
Title : Life-cycle cost based potimization of building-volume designs during early architectural design stages Material Type: printed text Authors: Schoch, Martin, Author ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name ; Mason, Paul, Associated Name Publisher: Bangkok : Shinawatra University Publication Date: 2011 Pagination: ix, 203 p. charts, tables Size: 30 cm. Price: 500 Baht General note: Photocopies,
Use full text in SIU only.Languages : English (eng) Descriptors: [LCSH]Architectural design
[LCSH]Architectural drawing -- Computer-aided designCurricular : BSMT/MSMT/PhDT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21130 Life-cycle cost based potimization of building-volume designs during early architectural design stages [printed text] / Schoch, Martin, Author ; Apichat Praditsmanont, Associated Name ; Mason, Paul, Associated Name . - Bangkok : Shinawatra University, 2011 . - ix, 203 p. charts, tables ; 30 cm.
500 Baht
Photocopies,
Use full text in SIU only.
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: [LCSH]Architectural design
[LCSH]Architectural drawing -- Computer-aided designCurricular : BSMT/MSMT/PhDT Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21130 Hold
Place a hold on this item
Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 32002000326825 SIU THE SOIT-PhD 2011-02 SIU Thesis and Dissertation Graduate Library Thesis Corner Available
