Available item(s) by this author

Developmental screening and follow-up by nurses / Lynch, Brian A. in MCN, Vol.40 No.6 (Nov-Dec) 2015 ([01/24/2016]) 

Public ISBD No review available on this record. [article]  inMCN > Vol.40 No.6 (Nov-Dec) 2015 [01/24/2016] . - p. 388-393 Title : Developmental screening and follow-up by nurses Material Type: printed text Authors: Lynch, Brian A., Author ; Weaver, Amy L., Author ; Starr, Stephanie R., Author Publication Date: 2016 Article on page: p. 388-393 Languages : English (eng) Keywords: Autism; Child development Developmental delay disorders Earty intervention: Screening: Surveillance. Abstract: The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) and Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (MCIA) are Objective:. Screening tools for developmental delay and autism, respectively This study aimed to evaluate commonly used dardized the effectiveness of implementing 18 - month developmental and autism screening by mail, with a stan follow - up process for abnormal screen results Methods:.. Within a prospective cohort study design, parents of 892 children received by mail the 18 - month ASQ and M - CHAT questionnaires between December 2008 and September 2009 A registered nurse scored the questionnaires and, if needed, administered follow - up screening or set up a referral to Early Intervention or sub -.. specialty pediatrics Medical record reviews determined clinical outcomes of children who required intervention after initial screening through September 2010 Additionally, demographic . factors were evaluated for association with responding to the questionnaires Results:. The ASQ and M - CHAT questionnaires were returned by 529 (50.3%) of the parents Parents of White chil - dren (390/575] 67.8%)) and those with private insurance (457/660 169.2%)) were significantly more likely to return screening questionnaires than parents of non - White (64/171 137.4%), p <.001) and government - insured children (58/169 [34.3%) ;. P <.001), respectively Of the 529 children with returned surveys, 109 (20.6%) did not pass at least 1 of the initial screens and 12 (2.3%) were referred after not passing the follow - up screening process. . Conclusions: Developmental and autism screening by mail is not a sufficient method to comprehensively screen ageneral pediatric population A nurse - completed, standardized follow - up process after an initial failed develop - mental screen may increase the yield of appropriate Early Intervention or subspecialty referrals. Link for e-copy: ้http://www.lww.com Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=25313 [article] Developmental screening and follow-up by nurses [printed text] / Lynch, Brian A., Author ; Weaver, Amy L., Author ; Starr, Stephanie R., Author . - 2016 . - p. 388-393. Languages : English (eng) inMCN > Vol.40 No.6 (Nov-Dec) 2015 [01/24/2016] . - p. 388-393 Keywords: Autism; Child development Developmental delay disorders Earty intervention: Screening: Surveillance. Abstract: The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) and Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (MCIA) are Objective:. Screening tools for developmental delay and autism, respectively This study aimed to evaluate commonly used dardized the effectiveness of implementing 18 - month developmental and autism screening by mail, with a stan follow - up process for abnormal screen results Methods:.. Within a prospective cohort study design, parents of 892 children received by mail the 18 - month ASQ and M - CHAT questionnaires between December 2008 and September 2009 A registered nurse scored the questionnaires and, if needed, administered follow - up screening or set up a referral to Early Intervention or sub -.. specialty pediatrics Medical record reviews determined clinical outcomes of children who required intervention after initial screening through September 2010 Additionally, demographic . factors were evaluated for association with responding to the questionnaires Results:. The ASQ and M - CHAT questionnaires were returned by 529 (50.3%) of the parents Parents of White chil - dren (390/575] 67.8%)) and those with private insurance (457/660 169.2%)) were significantly more likely to return screening questionnaires than parents of non - White (64/171 137.4%), p <.001) and government - insured children (58/169 [34.3%) ;. P <.001), respectively Of the 529 children with returned surveys, 109 (20.6%) did not pass at least 1 of the initial screens and 12 (2.3%) were referred after not passing the follow - up screening process. . Conclusions: Developmental and autism screening by mail is not a sufficient method to comprehensively screen ageneral pediatric population A nurse - completed, standardized follow - up process after an initial failed develop - mental screen may increase the yield of appropriate Early Intervention or subspecialty referrals. Link for e-copy: ้http://www.lww.com Record link: http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=25313