[article] 
inJournal of Pediatric Nursing > Vol.37 No.6 (Nov-Dec) 2017 [03/29/2018] . - p.91-96

Title :	Comparison of Children's Venipuncture Fear and Pain : Randomized Controlled Trial of EMLA® and J-Tip Needleless Injection System
Material Type:	printed text
Publication Date:	2018
Article on page:	p.91-96
Languages :	English (eng) Original Language : English (eng)
Keywords:	Procedural pain management, Procedural fear, IV, EMLA® topical local anesthetic, J-Tip® Needle-free device.
Abstract:	Purpose Needle procedures, like venipuncture and intravenous (IV) catheter insertion, are recognized as a common cause of pain and fear for children in hospitals and emergency departments. The purpose of this study was to compare children's self-reported pain and fear related to IV insertion with administration of either the topical local anesthetic EMLA® or 1% buffered lidocaine delivered with the J-Tip Needleless Injection System® (J-Tip®). Design and Methods In this prospective, randomized trial, 150 consecutive pediatric patients 8 to 18 years of age undergoing IV insertion were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment group. Participants self-reported procedural pain using a Visual Analog Scale, and procedural fear using the Children's Fear Scale. Results Procedural pain scores were significantly lower in the EMLA® group (mean score 1.63 + 1.659) vs. the J-Tip® group (2.99 ± 2.586; p < 0.001). Post-procedure fear scores were significantly lower than pre-procedure fear scores in both treatment groups (p < 0.002), but there was no difference in fear scores between the two treatment groups (p = 0.314). Conclusion EMLA® provided superior pain relief for IV insertion compared to J-Tip®.
Link for e-copy:	http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-pediatric-nursing/
Record link:	http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27632

[article] Comparison of Children's Venipuncture Fear and Pain : Randomized Controlled Trial of EMLA® and J-Tip Needleless Injection System [printed text] . - 2018 . - p.91-96.
Languages : English (eng) Original Language  : English (eng)
inJournal of Pediatric Nursing > Vol.37 No.6 (Nov-Dec) 2017 [03/29/2018] . - p.91-96

Keywords:	Procedural pain management, Procedural fear, IV, EMLA® topical local anesthetic, J-Tip® Needle-free device.
Abstract:	Purpose Needle procedures, like venipuncture and intravenous (IV) catheter insertion, are recognized as a common cause of pain and fear for children in hospitals and emergency departments. The purpose of this study was to compare children's self-reported pain and fear related to IV insertion with administration of either the topical local anesthetic EMLA® or 1% buffered lidocaine delivered with the J-Tip Needleless Injection System® (J-Tip®). Design and Methods In this prospective, randomized trial, 150 consecutive pediatric patients 8 to 18 years of age undergoing IV insertion were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment group. Participants self-reported procedural pain using a Visual Analog Scale, and procedural fear using the Children's Fear Scale. Results Procedural pain scores were significantly lower in the EMLA® group (mean score 1.63 + 1.659) vs. the J-Tip® group (2.99 ± 2.586; p < 0.001). Post-procedure fear scores were significantly lower than pre-procedure fear scores in both treatment groups (p < 0.002), but there was no difference in fear scores between the two treatment groups (p = 0.314). Conclusion EMLA® provided superior pain relief for IV insertion compared to J-Tip®.
Link for e-copy:	http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-pediatric-nursing/
Record link:	http://libsearch.siu.ac.th/siu/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27632